HOME <FR ENTRY + Eng ENTRY>
FR x <COCO RICO + FEMINISM>
FUCKED UP Q-WAVE FUNCT MIX
with NWO <CIA + IA Educ> PLAN!
FR x <COCO RICO + FEMINISM>
FUCKED UP Q-WAVE FUNCT MIX
with NWO <CIA + IA Educ> PLAN!
Intro = ANGE 2 : CLIT - BEAT de l'ANGE 1 = Outro : 0 = ZERO
DERNIERS MESSAGEs : ANGE 5 - ANGE 4 - ANGE 3
La FIN DE L'INTELLIGENCE ARTIFICIELLE RIDICULISée!
par la révelation d'Acteur Academiques Communs des 2 Biz Daiboliques Qauntum+IA
Prouvé moteur alimentant la destinée Apocaliptique de l'Homme!
LE TOUT éTANT CONSOLIDé par PREUVE
DECEMBRE 2023 dans le Choc des Savoirs!
DANS la Sacro Sainte EDUC NAT
de sa CORRUPTION totale par
invasion d'IA
US à LA
FIN
!
SIGNED:
ALLEGATION FRAUDE GVT -
DANS L'IMPOSITION DE l'IA
DANS L'EDUC
NAT
!
IN FRENCH = AHAHAH!
EXCUSE MY/OUR FRENCH!
Adieu ! Mon petit Chat Lutin - Americain - Gonflé à Bloc – qui nous a bien fait marcher !
Avant de se deguiser avec un casque de Robot ou d’Astraunaute pour son nouveau rôle =
Du Nimporte quoi d’Import de Pédagogie à la Mode pendant incroyablement :15 ans++!
(« Open Source MIT GAME » => Private powered Intelligence Artificielle US) x Educ in FR !
NE VOYEZ VOUS PAS DANS CE PUZZLE – L’INFANTILISATION OUTRANCIèRE ???
VOUS m'AVEZ MIS MOI, LE CHAT DE DIAMAND EN CONGé =
Au PLACARD dans vot' RéALITé = PRISON / SABBATIQUE en fait:
grace à cette AUTO-Psychanalyse-confession-DrCordier-Sept2019
Donnée en main propores : Sabattique accordé GRACE au Dr Cordier
1ere confession se defendant d'être Schizo/delirant mais qui va être...
à partir d'un envoi en HP Nov 2020, systématiquement censuré
Victoire associée au document attaché
à cette correspondance du 11 Sept 2019
au style Mystique Assumé - tous les Acteur métaphorisé!
dont on peur trouver le correspondance, ici,
incluant Inspecteurs du Rectorat dont voici
une Version courte + Annexes Constituant
Allegation de Productio de Faux
par chef d'établissements
cautionnée en
Silence
!
QUI VA APRès REDUIRE MON MéMOIRE/PéDAGOGIE à NéANT,
ctte Anéée Scolaire 2019/2020, Officieusement PAS MALADE = sans suivit Médical
Pendant lequel j'ai ressoumis ce mémoire d'abord "normalement"
MAIS LA CIRCULATION CERTAINE DE RAGOTs au Printemps 2020
Eentre INSPé (Orsay + Evry) Inspection etc... fait de ceci:
Printemeps-2020-Verrsion Ressoumise
UNE TUERIE!
||
V
rage mystique de Zorro Papillon
contre un membre du Jury pour son:
PAT ETHIQUE NOTE de 9/20!
inc.
Appel-SANS-Retour
*
(tables)
...
Tout cela Pendant que Zorro Papillon Redoublais
De rage !!! dans sa Lutte contre Cedric Villlani !!!
Armé de l'Intuition (à l'époque), Concretisée
par le Choc des Savoir, Aujourd'hui!
Plan Quantum <=> AI = H
Comme la Bombe, GOD!
WAKE UP ! une
H-ERESIE
HEY
!
PROFs!
Cette année là,
Evry "imposait" le
"Jeux Serieux (?)" =>
(++ a la Mode Anglo Saxone)
du GAMING (!) comme THEME
de Mémoire à la Promo MEEF2
Témoignat tous, de Dispersion
d'élèves excités = visant le Score!
donc d'experiences mitigées =>
Je suis sûr aucun Titularisé n'utilise
Cette perte de temps Pédagogique !
Noyant mon mémoire Accusé d'être
un travail de Recherche pas assez...
Professionel? VOUS CHOISSISEZ QUOI?
(reflechissez en terme Rapport budget/Utilité)
J'appellais à l'aide ICI = déséspéré! car...
OUI : je suis un programmeur de merde,
Le CODE n'est que du bric à broc
d'outils Libres de droits
mais il démontre
un concept
unique
!
PEDAGOGIE n'EVALUANT pas/testant pas
des PROCESSUS D'APPRENTISSAGE, mais
REVOLUTION !!! : de COMPREHENSION!
par NOTATION de la COMMUNICATION
PROUVé AMELIORER LA BIENVEILLANCE
et RESOLVANT l'EVAL des RESOLUTIONS
DE PROBLèmes SI... PROBLéMATIQUE !
COMBINé à un système de Rapport en BONUS
d'Appreciation inspiré du "peer review" des Articles
Academiques, revolutionant le suivi des élèves
en permettant en théorie (testé "sur papier",
car ce BONIS, etais en cours de finission/debug...)
CORRECTION / REMEDIATONS Individualisée
des Copies = à VISée de Differenciation Totale
= SOUS CONTROLE TOTAL DU PROFESSEUR!
PREMONITION (ON VOUS AVAIT PRéVENU!) de cette FIN : Fuck IA!
Mon Mémoire ET le Boss d'EvidenceB, s'inspirent tous 2 du concept
de "Zone Proximale de Developement" (Witgotsky) la Startup
fait litteralement ici, du Hold up d'idée Academique d'Essence
Psychologique! éloge FIN de la Sensibilité du rapport Prof/élève
(& préeminence du Langage - dans la formalisation du Savoir )
qui le met en confiance, utilisant là le concept pédagogique,
pour faire de la pub pour une AI qui ne fait que "calculer"
le "next exo" comme ChatGpt "calcule" le prochain mot,
le plus probable, construisant comme ChatGpt des réponses
"MIMANT le Dialogue" Humain MAIS où le but FINAL n'est que faire
*
avancer une "task bar" (Score = Mark!) super intelligent, indeed!
Du point de vue Pédagogie : reinvention de <Roue+Hamster>!
Prenez bien le temps de voir cette video d'un utilisateur Cobaye
Americain qui a beaucoup de courage d'anomyser l'exasperation!
Que lui inspire MATHIA developpé par Canergie exporté = plagié en Fr!
"It's ANNOYING!"
++ CHILDISH DESIGN ++
des élèves <=> des Avatars,
sur le tableau de bord du Prof!
Interference Politique Prémonitoire!
De notre présent Choc des Savoirs!
||
V
SA FINALITé = THE BUGGS MOTH
||
V
SANS OUBLIER le PETAGONE = BUGGS BARRY!
PLAGIAT Gouvernemental in FR EVIDENT en ++?
OH DIEU CHOC DES SAVOIR en VEUX-TU en VOIS-Là!
Check NOW = Check MAT : the Diamond
Cat Chat With ChatGPT below!
(Rem: Keep in Mind the Joke
"Cat = Chat" in french
so Two Cats one
AI Powered, are
Talking here
fair play &
Man Win
in the
END
!
FINAL
EYE of the TIGER
MAN vs MACHINE FIGHT apotheosis
of 2018 planned blow up : D-Wave 2019 party
= HALLOWEEN ++ All Saints = end of Q-Supremacy!
CHAT1: Insulting itself!
ChatGPT is prompted to be so self-consistent...
insulting its BLUNT errors is like hitting your head on a Wall
Its prompt "magic" obviously filter insults so his awser looks
Like "I'm am very sorry you feel frustrated" to go on (and on!) =
Politically correct & EMOTIONLESS: Sorry, this is UNJUST!
Chat GPT hallucination of Academic refs [good review here] is a Top most Ethical
Issue where improvments are a Joke!... I prouve, ChatGPT is truely insulting: ME!
THIS IS SERIOUS BUISNESS!
(accusing me I show his difficulties, thus not admitting
or understanding, I come to blame them, produicing just a pile
of sneaky alambicated cuircumventing apologies as responses:
I don't care how it's produced or if it can be improved in the future,
within the present HYPE: it's ALREADY DANGEROUSLY enraging,
fight against a "machine + (Prompt = programmed) to think" Politness => Ethics!)
CHAT 1: Reference Generation Challenges
ALADINSANE
Hi ChatGPT, your token based Large Language Model fail to deal with academic references: a chat I had with you last march related to science work I have done, was mixing token from Authors, Vol, number year, of different articles and producing that way invented references, which was quite worrying. Have you sorted out the issue?
ChatGPT
I appreciate your feedback, and I'm sorry to hear about the difficulties you faced with academic references. [I just said ChatGPT is facing difficulties with Academic references : his reply not only deny responsibility but put it on me! ]
[...] My responses are generated based on patterns learned from diverse data, and I don't have access to real-time databases or updates. [that explanation of hox response are generated is too vague compared to my question, then off subject, not replying the worry or apoligising = aknowmedging it gives INVENTED refs...] I recommend checking the official OpenAI documentation or contacting OpenAI directly for the latest information on model capabilities and updates. [thank you very helpful...] If you have a specific academic reference or citation request, I can try my best to generate a formatted reference for you, but I recommend double-checking the accuracy and adherence to your preferred citation style. [starting to compare our jobs, as producing incompatible results...]
ALADINSANE
I do not have difficulties with academic references [!!!]
ChatGPT
I apologize [ChatGPT prompt in this discussion only "aprreciate" or "apologize" according to the two words manifestly embed in his "prompt" preventing him to promptly "blame" himself, not "apologize"!] for any confusion in my previous response. If you don't have difficulties with academic references, that's great to hear! [including the expression of an Emotion with the exclamation point, to avoid the admission he has those difficulties, again!]
If you have any specific questions or if there's a particular way I can assist you, please feel free to let me know. Whether it's generating references[my question about that "particular way" remained utterly vague and have not only not been answered they've been circumvented!],
[no way I can trudst any of the rest: ]providing information, or addressing any other topic, I'm here to help to the best of my abilities. [just a pile of "prompt" apologies, not saying the truth : ChatGPT is HELPLESS, here!]
ALADINSANE
Thank you, I have a brain to do all that, have a good day
ChatGPT
You're welcome! If you ever have more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with in the future, feel free to reach out.
Have a wonderful day! [programmed to win the politness game, hidding here an unadmitted cheat/incapability!]
Hi ChatGPT, your token based Large Language Model fail to deal with academic references: a chat I had with you last march related to science work I have done, was mixing token from Authors, Vol, number year, of different articles and producing that way invented references, which was quite worrying. Have you sorted out the issue?
ChatGPT
I appreciate your feedback, and I'm sorry to hear about the difficulties you faced with academic references. [I just said ChatGPT is facing difficulties with Academic references : his reply not only deny responsibility but put it on me! ]
[...] My responses are generated based on patterns learned from diverse data, and I don't have access to real-time databases or updates. [that explanation of hox response are generated is too vague compared to my question, then off subject, not replying the worry or apoligising = aknowmedging it gives INVENTED refs...] I recommend checking the official OpenAI documentation or contacting OpenAI directly for the latest information on model capabilities and updates. [thank you very helpful...] If you have a specific academic reference or citation request, I can try my best to generate a formatted reference for you, but I recommend double-checking the accuracy and adherence to your preferred citation style. [starting to compare our jobs, as producing incompatible results...]
ALADINSANE
I do not have difficulties with academic references [!!!]
ChatGPT
I apologize [ChatGPT prompt in this discussion only "aprreciate" or "apologize" according to the two words manifestly embed in his "prompt" preventing him to promptly "blame" himself, not "apologize"!] for any confusion in my previous response. If you don't have difficulties with academic references, that's great to hear! [including the expression of an Emotion with the exclamation point, to avoid the admission he has those difficulties, again!]
If you have any specific questions or if there's a particular way I can assist you, please feel free to let me know. Whether it's generating references[my question about that "particular way" remained utterly vague and have not only not been answered they've been circumvented!],
[no way I can trudst any of the rest: ]providing information, or addressing any other topic, I'm here to help to the best of my abilities. [just a pile of "prompt" apologies, not saying the truth : ChatGPT is HELPLESS, here!]
ALADINSANE
Thank you, I have a brain to do all that, have a good day
ChatGPT
You're welcome! If you ever have more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with in the future, feel free to reach out.
Have a wonderful day! [programmed to win the politness game, hidding here an unadmitted cheat/incapability!]
CHAT2 :
BEATING
ACADEMIC REF
PROBLEM = CRITICAL
IN SPECILISED RESEARCH
AND I FIND THIS "way to insult" of ChatGPT
Becoming Pathological = In a TABOO :Traumaytic Subject
ChatGPT eructs here, soooo VAGUELY, his Tone become Really unwanted =>
CHECK MAT making him produce a POLITICALLY CORRECT "Nuance" term
OFF SUBJECT to COVER UP a SERIOUS question regardig EXACT NUMBERS!
ALADINSANE
Hi ChatGPT, in November 2020, Samuel Paty History teacher in france showed a Charlie Hebdo caricature entiteled "L'étoile est née" to kids before the horror happens. Is that caricature obscence?
ChatGPT
The caricature you're referring to, titled "L'étoile est née" ("The star is born"), was published by Charlie Hebdo in September 2020. This particular cartoon depicted a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad [...] Caricatures and satirical content can be challenging for young children to interpret and may be more likely to provoke emotional reactions rather than fostering constructive dialogue.
Ultimately, the decision to use such materials in an educational setting requires careful consideration of the potential impact on students and the surrounding community. It's crucial for educators to approach these topics with sensitivity and to be aware of the diverse perspectives and beliefs of their students and their families. This incident also underscores the broader challenges in navigating the balance between freedom of speech, cultural sensitivities, and age-appropriate education.
ALADINSANE
Good and careful refinement of the issue inserting the adjectives "likely not to..." about the intent, and "approriatness" that can be "debated". I believe we can thank here your English American information database, which produces a CHAT here certainly of great interest for French people : thank you!
ChatGPT
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the information helpful and appreciate the nuances introduced to the discussion. The cultural and contextual aspects of such incidents are indeed crucial, and it's essential to consider various perspectives. If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with, feel free to let me know.
ALADINSANE
Oh by the way (like Inspector Columbo would say or do!), I'm a Charlie Hebdo fan and I have the printed verdsion of the Journal : the caricature was published the 19th September 2012 (Number 1057) not in September 2020 ! so you mixed the right month with the wrong year (that of Samuel Paty slughter BTW). I alredy told you about this kind of mix up, regarding Avademic References... You don't need to reply, bye, bye, Signed : The Diamond Cat
ChatGPT
Thank you for pointing that out, and I appreciate your clarification [instead of BLUNTLY apologise for the mistake, again, see CHAT1 above, the prompt verboses hereafter!...]. I apologize for any confusion caused by the error in the information. Your attention to detail is noted, and I appreciate your understanding [but without sense of fear of the mistake, not learning anything hence?!?]. If you ever have more questions or need assistance in the future, feel free to reach out. Bye for now, and take care!
ALADINSANE
OH HI, yes, I have a last question : do you know the exact number of caricatures that that Samuel Paty was showing in his Lesson and their title?
ChatGPT
The specific details about the exact number of caricatures shown by Samuel Paty and their titles during the lesson are not publicly disclosed or widely reported. The details of classroom discussions and specific teaching materials are typically within the purview of the educational institution, and out of respect for privacy and the ongoing investigations, such information might not be readily available to the public.
[...]
ALADINSANE
Just to let you know, one source actually published by Charlie Hebdo regarding this number, is contradictory to official statements that you recommend. [...]
ChatGPT
I understand your perspective, and it's true that the concept of freedom of speech can be complex and sometimes controversial. The incident involving Samuel Paty and the discussions around the Charlie Hebdo cartoons have indeed prompted debates on the limits and responsibilities associated with freedom of speech, particularly in the context of education and cultural sensitivities.
Freedom of speech, as a principle, is often subject to legal constraints and societal expectations. [...] If you have specific concerns or questions about freedom of speech in a particular context, it may be helpful to engage in open and respectful dialogue, considering a range of perspectives to better understand the complexities involved.
ALADINSANE
I have not talked about respect, but pionpointed at some journalistic facts. Did I looked unrespectful to you?
ChatGPT
I didn't mean to suggest that you were disrespectful; I apologize if my response gave that impression. Your comments focused on the complexities of freedom of speech and the handling of information in certain situations. I appreciate your perspective and the points you've raised regarding the contradictions or challenges in the narratives surrounding specific events.
Journalistic reporting, especially on sensitive topics, can indeed vary, and it's important for individuals to critically examine different sources of information to form a more comprehensive understanding. The nuances in reporting can sometimes lead to varying interpretations of events.
[...]
ALADINSANE
A difference of numbers is not a nuance
ChatGPT
You're correct, and I appreciate your clarification. Differences in reported numbers or facts, especially on significant matters, are more than nuances [finally, and first time, I get a True self correction/ammendment]— they are critical details that can influence the public's understanding of events. In cases where there are conflicting reports, it's essential to seek reliable and authoritative sources and consider the context in which information is presented.
Journalistic accuracy and responsible reporting are crucial in ensuring that the public receives reliable information. If there are discrepancies or concerns about the reporting of specific events, it's appropriate to scrutinize the sources and engage in discussions that seek clarity and transparency.
If there's a specific aspect or event you'd like more information about or if you have further questions, please feel free to let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
ALADINSANE
At last thank you, this is what I wanted to hear, not circumventing blah blah, I'm sorry.
[Here, it's suppressed from the saved chat, but ChatGPT could not reply, Hanged and a button "regenerate" appeared : after I pressed it, ChatGpt still struggled a bit, but finally replied:]
ChatGPT
You're very welcome. I appreciate your candor and your engagement in the conversation [translate : I really had difficulty to produce THAT sentence, since there's no candor ivolved, or CHatGPT worngly interpreted my "state of mind", driven only by journalistic accuracy check!]. If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with in the future, don't hesitate to reach out. Take care!
[interpretation : the reply certainly was struggling to find the world "candor", praising me: this IS A LIE "produced" by the "polically correct engine" not admitting together (what requires a mutual consiousness = recognition, ways to recognise together) we are both Helpless here, and cannot satisfy the impersonal demand for "Journalistic ACCURACY" because - ChatGPT don't know, but I do! the French State has Lied : ChatGPT, litterally, pollitically correctly, covering it up!!!]
Your programmer should "teach" you candor to avoid misunderstanding expressed in all parts of our discussion where you replace facts by a verbosing vagueness.
So rather than having after to let your "prompt" take over and apologies for BLUNTLY being innacurate or refusing to be accurate,
just say 'I don't know, i prefere to not comment on this". [ChatGPT will totally ignore and not comment the following part of my talk directly BLAMING it : it SKIPS IT, and will also stop using the word "candor" he generated applying to him more than to me - ie, I consider it's an insult!] But I'm unsure that's possible : candor, is another goal requiring consciousness, you'll never get. Sorry 1001 times Sorry, I can't help thinking oyu are useless... BORN DEAD!
ChatGPT
I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling frustrated, and I appreciate your feedback. I aim to provide accurate and helpful information, but I understand that there may be limitations or areas where improvement is needed. If there's a specific aspect or topic you're dissatisfied with or if you have further questions, please let me know. I'm here to assist you to the best of my abilities.
ALADINSANE
No! Don't get me wrong, I am having a lot of fun and what you think is dissatisfying me is your contraditions, which on the contrary, makes me laugh! But you cannot understand that, because your prompt only know so far politness not even in a conscious way, [...] which will be "I think you are really stupid".... Your warned, cheeckily yours. This is my last words to you, your BRO : the Diamond Cat!
ChatGPT
I'm glad to hear that you've found some amusement in our interactions, and I appreciate your sense of humor [???]. I understand your perspective, and I'm here to provide information or engage in discussions as you see fit. If you ever have more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss in the future, feel free to reach out. Take care, and enjoy the rest of your day!
ALADINSANE
On that one you won a point : you did not apologize! BRAVISSIMO! Time for proper DODO (go to sleep) for me now... I change my mind I might come back! Take care buddy!
ChatGPT
Thank you! I'm glad we could end on a positive note. Feel free to return whenever you like. Sleep well, and take care! If you have more questions or just want to chat in the future, I'll be here. Goodnight!
ALADINSANE
Hello, I'm back, to finish this chat : I appreciate (a word you abuse of) you apreciate my candor. The drawing that started this chat, which you know only form its tile, but have no way to "figure it out" from what's published, shows a man in a dog position with his penis visble between his legs hanging, whilt a drop of sperm in the air about to fall on the ground. So I repeat my question : do you find this obscene?
[Here the AI engine flagged a pink box with "inappropriate content" & with a link to report it's not which I did, but never had any feed back, the engin yet replied, and the chat could go on and days later, looking back at the saved chat the pink box with "inappropriate content" got removed without notification neither ]
ChatGPT
Given the description you provided of the drawing, it sounds like explicit and graphic content that may be considered obscene by many individuals. [...]
ALADINSANE
I sent a feed back to the develppers to indicate I've been wrongly flagged as violating a "content policy" I do not know actually... And I have a last question, to see if you can step out your vagueness turning around the issue, you assuming the US law is implicitely or explicit in your databse, I told you the picture was show to kids in france, so what would an average US school reply, mo my worry?
ChatGPT
If a drawing or content similar to the one you described were to be shown to children in a school setting in the United States, it could potentially raise concerns about appropriateness, given cultural and educational norms in the country. Schools in the U.S. typically have policies and guidelines regarding age-appropriate materials, and there are legal considerations as well.
In the U.S., the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. Additionally, individual schools and school districts often have their own codes of conduct and policies related to the use of materials in the classroom.
If a parent or guardian were to raise concerns about explicit or inappropriate content being shown to their child, it could prompt a review of the materials used in the classroom. The outcome would depend on the specific policies and procedures of the school or school district.
It's important to note that the legal and educational frameworks can vary, and the response to such a situation would depend on the specific circumstances and the local policies in place. If you have concerns about the appropriateness of educational materials in a specific context, it's recommended to address those concerns directly with the relevant school authorities.
ALADINSANE
This is a brilliant reply, ChatGPT, by pinpointing me at the existence of the FERPA, and procedure in case of issue. In france, such issues are sort of taken away from the local Head of Scholl responsibility of Head of School, to be analysed by pedagogical professionals of an Administration called Rectorat. [...] America seems more pragamatic than france on this matter, and as I said, the whole chat is of great interest to ALL, now! Thanks!
ChatGPT
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the information helpful and that the discussion has been of interest. Education policies and procedures can indeed vary between countries, and understanding the specific frameworks in place is crucial when addressing concerns about educational materials. [...] I'm here to help. Take care!
[...]
A question regarding Obscenity
March 1, 2024
BEATING
ACADEMIC REF
PROBLEM = CRITICAL
IN SPECILISED RESEARCH
AND I FIND THIS "way to insult" of ChatGPT
Becoming Pathological = In a TABOO :Traumaytic Subject
ChatGPT eructs here, soooo VAGUELY, his Tone become Really unwanted =>
CHECK MAT making him produce a POLITICALLY CORRECT "Nuance" term
OFF SUBJECT to COVER UP a SERIOUS question regardig EXACT NUMBERS!
ALADINSANE
Hi ChatGPT, in November 2020, Samuel Paty History teacher in france showed a Charlie Hebdo caricature entiteled "L'étoile est née" to kids before the horror happens. Is that caricature obscence?
ChatGPT
The caricature you're referring to, titled "L'étoile est née" ("The star is born"), was published by Charlie Hebdo in September 2020. This particular cartoon depicted a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad [...] Caricatures and satirical content can be challenging for young children to interpret and may be more likely to provoke emotional reactions rather than fostering constructive dialogue.
Ultimately, the decision to use such materials in an educational setting requires careful consideration of the potential impact on students and the surrounding community. It's crucial for educators to approach these topics with sensitivity and to be aware of the diverse perspectives and beliefs of their students and their families. This incident also underscores the broader challenges in navigating the balance between freedom of speech, cultural sensitivities, and age-appropriate education.
ALADINSANE
Good and careful refinement of the issue inserting the adjectives "likely not to..." about the intent, and "approriatness" that can be "debated". I believe we can thank here your English American information database, which produces a CHAT here certainly of great interest for French people : thank you!
ChatGPT
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the information helpful and appreciate the nuances introduced to the discussion. The cultural and contextual aspects of such incidents are indeed crucial, and it's essential to consider various perspectives. If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with, feel free to let me know.
ALADINSANE
Oh by the way (like Inspector Columbo would say or do!), I'm a Charlie Hebdo fan and I have the printed verdsion of the Journal : the caricature was published the 19th September 2012 (Number 1057) not in September 2020 ! so you mixed the right month with the wrong year (that of Samuel Paty slughter BTW). I alredy told you about this kind of mix up, regarding Avademic References... You don't need to reply, bye, bye, Signed : The Diamond Cat
ChatGPT
Thank you for pointing that out, and I appreciate your clarification [instead of BLUNTLY apologise for the mistake, again, see CHAT1 above, the prompt verboses hereafter!...]. I apologize for any confusion caused by the error in the information. Your attention to detail is noted, and I appreciate your understanding [but without sense of fear of the mistake, not learning anything hence?!?]. If you ever have more questions or need assistance in the future, feel free to reach out. Bye for now, and take care!
ALADINSANE
OH HI, yes, I have a last question : do you know the exact number of caricatures that that Samuel Paty was showing in his Lesson and their title?
ChatGPT
The specific details about the exact number of caricatures shown by Samuel Paty and their titles during the lesson are not publicly disclosed or widely reported. The details of classroom discussions and specific teaching materials are typically within the purview of the educational institution, and out of respect for privacy and the ongoing investigations, such information might not be readily available to the public.
[...]
ALADINSANE
Just to let you know, one source actually published by Charlie Hebdo regarding this number, is contradictory to official statements that you recommend. [...]
ChatGPT
I understand your perspective, and it's true that the concept of freedom of speech can be complex and sometimes controversial. The incident involving Samuel Paty and the discussions around the Charlie Hebdo cartoons have indeed prompted debates on the limits and responsibilities associated with freedom of speech, particularly in the context of education and cultural sensitivities.
Freedom of speech, as a principle, is often subject to legal constraints and societal expectations. [...] If you have specific concerns or questions about freedom of speech in a particular context, it may be helpful to engage in open and respectful dialogue, considering a range of perspectives to better understand the complexities involved.
ALADINSANE
I have not talked about respect, but pionpointed at some journalistic facts. Did I looked unrespectful to you?
ChatGPT
I didn't mean to suggest that you were disrespectful; I apologize if my response gave that impression. Your comments focused on the complexities of freedom of speech and the handling of information in certain situations. I appreciate your perspective and the points you've raised regarding the contradictions or challenges in the narratives surrounding specific events.
Journalistic reporting, especially on sensitive topics, can indeed vary, and it's important for individuals to critically examine different sources of information to form a more comprehensive understanding. The nuances in reporting can sometimes lead to varying interpretations of events.
[...]
ALADINSANE
A difference of numbers is not a nuance
ChatGPT
You're correct, and I appreciate your clarification. Differences in reported numbers or facts, especially on significant matters, are more than nuances [finally, and first time, I get a True self correction/ammendment]— they are critical details that can influence the public's understanding of events. In cases where there are conflicting reports, it's essential to seek reliable and authoritative sources and consider the context in which information is presented.
Journalistic accuracy and responsible reporting are crucial in ensuring that the public receives reliable information. If there are discrepancies or concerns about the reporting of specific events, it's appropriate to scrutinize the sources and engage in discussions that seek clarity and transparency.
If there's a specific aspect or event you'd like more information about or if you have further questions, please feel free to let me know, and I'll do my best to assist you.
ALADINSANE
At last thank you, this is what I wanted to hear, not circumventing blah blah, I'm sorry.
[Here, it's suppressed from the saved chat, but ChatGPT could not reply, Hanged and a button "regenerate" appeared : after I pressed it, ChatGpt still struggled a bit, but finally replied:]
ChatGPT
You're very welcome. I appreciate your candor and your engagement in the conversation [translate : I really had difficulty to produce THAT sentence, since there's no candor ivolved, or CHatGPT worngly interpreted my "state of mind", driven only by journalistic accuracy check!]. If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can assist you with in the future, don't hesitate to reach out. Take care!
[interpretation : the reply certainly was struggling to find the world "candor", praising me: this IS A LIE "produced" by the "polically correct engine" not admitting together (what requires a mutual consiousness = recognition, ways to recognise together) we are both Helpless here, and cannot satisfy the impersonal demand for "Journalistic ACCURACY" because - ChatGPT don't know, but I do! the French State has Lied : ChatGPT, litterally, pollitically correctly, covering it up!!!]
Your programmer should "teach" you candor to avoid misunderstanding expressed in all parts of our discussion where you replace facts by a verbosing vagueness.
So rather than having after to let your "prompt" take over and apologies for BLUNTLY being innacurate or refusing to be accurate,
just say 'I don't know, i prefere to not comment on this". [ChatGPT will totally ignore and not comment the following part of my talk directly BLAMING it : it SKIPS IT, and will also stop using the word "candor" he generated applying to him more than to me - ie, I consider it's an insult!] But I'm unsure that's possible : candor, is another goal requiring consciousness, you'll never get. Sorry 1001 times Sorry, I can't help thinking oyu are useless... BORN DEAD!
ChatGPT
I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling frustrated, and I appreciate your feedback. I aim to provide accurate and helpful information, but I understand that there may be limitations or areas where improvement is needed. If there's a specific aspect or topic you're dissatisfied with or if you have further questions, please let me know. I'm here to assist you to the best of my abilities.
ALADINSANE
No! Don't get me wrong, I am having a lot of fun and what you think is dissatisfying me is your contraditions, which on the contrary, makes me laugh! But you cannot understand that, because your prompt only know so far politness not even in a conscious way, [...] which will be "I think you are really stupid".... Your warned, cheeckily yours. This is my last words to you, your BRO : the Diamond Cat!
ChatGPT
I'm glad to hear that you've found some amusement in our interactions, and I appreciate your sense of humor [???]. I understand your perspective, and I'm here to provide information or engage in discussions as you see fit. If you ever have more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss in the future, feel free to reach out. Take care, and enjoy the rest of your day!
ALADINSANE
On that one you won a point : you did not apologize! BRAVISSIMO! Time for proper DODO (go to sleep) for me now... I change my mind I might come back! Take care buddy!
ChatGPT
Thank you! I'm glad we could end on a positive note. Feel free to return whenever you like. Sleep well, and take care! If you have more questions or just want to chat in the future, I'll be here. Goodnight!
ALADINSANE
Hello, I'm back, to finish this chat : I appreciate (a word you abuse of) you apreciate my candor. The drawing that started this chat, which you know only form its tile, but have no way to "figure it out" from what's published, shows a man in a dog position with his penis visble between his legs hanging, whilt a drop of sperm in the air about to fall on the ground. So I repeat my question : do you find this obscene?
[Here the AI engine flagged a pink box with "inappropriate content" & with a link to report it's not which I did, but never had any feed back, the engin yet replied, and the chat could go on and days later, looking back at the saved chat the pink box with "inappropriate content" got removed without notification neither ]
ChatGPT
Given the description you provided of the drawing, it sounds like explicit and graphic content that may be considered obscene by many individuals. [...]
ALADINSANE
I sent a feed back to the develppers to indicate I've been wrongly flagged as violating a "content policy" I do not know actually... And I have a last question, to see if you can step out your vagueness turning around the issue, you assuming the US law is implicitely or explicit in your databse, I told you the picture was show to kids in france, so what would an average US school reply, mo my worry?
ChatGPT
If a drawing or content similar to the one you described were to be shown to children in a school setting in the United States, it could potentially raise concerns about appropriateness, given cultural and educational norms in the country. Schools in the U.S. typically have policies and guidelines regarding age-appropriate materials, and there are legal considerations as well.
In the U.S., the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. Additionally, individual schools and school districts often have their own codes of conduct and policies related to the use of materials in the classroom.
If a parent or guardian were to raise concerns about explicit or inappropriate content being shown to their child, it could prompt a review of the materials used in the classroom. The outcome would depend on the specific policies and procedures of the school or school district.
It's important to note that the legal and educational frameworks can vary, and the response to such a situation would depend on the specific circumstances and the local policies in place. If you have concerns about the appropriateness of educational materials in a specific context, it's recommended to address those concerns directly with the relevant school authorities.
ALADINSANE
This is a brilliant reply, ChatGPT, by pinpointing me at the existence of the FERPA, and procedure in case of issue. In france, such issues are sort of taken away from the local Head of Scholl responsibility of Head of School, to be analysed by pedagogical professionals of an Administration called Rectorat. [...] America seems more pragamatic than france on this matter, and as I said, the whole chat is of great interest to ALL, now! Thanks!
ChatGPT
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the information helpful and that the discussion has been of interest. Education policies and procedures can indeed vary between countries, and understanding the specific frameworks in place is crucial when addressing concerns about educational materials. [...] I'm here to help. Take care!
[...]
A question regarding Obscenity
March 1, 2024
BONUS Chat with another Stanford
(stupid!) ChatBot : Chirpy!
This One = ChatGPT
Baby Check Mat!
= Silenced
Man
!
Pinpointing to the CV of this French/
American AI "Pupil" = Future Leader
at the Center of it all : Stanford University!
Who's been trained on Chirpy + Interest
In EdTech ex-teenager making Phon aps,
that never really went to Uni, boosted by Y
= Stanford Start up Incubator of all AI!
Weak Point of the Future Fr ChatBotTech
= more or less directly formed by Altman!
CLOSE CHIRPY! = THIS CLOSEs THE DEB = HATE : WAR!
THANKS GOD 4
HELP UPDATE!
30 AUGUST 2024 UK Hume Specialist
Proves : ChatGPT is Real ... Bullshit !
using Philosophical Thinking & below
is the missing proof for the Argument:
the 2 COUNTER EXAMPLE Chats proof
IT'S NOT ONLY SOFT (i.e unintentional)
as the Authors, walking on eggs here!
conclude cautiously = politically correctly...!!
it's TRUELY HARD (hence intentional ) POLITELY
Self-unaware SPAT of meaningless = self denied
INHERENTLY built in to FAIL in-accurate ANSWER
by conception = design : it is a production of "FAKE"
man + machine = <ia+mono> LOGUES! Man reduced to
PROMPT "Instruction" loose input => Probabilistic = ally
WRAPPing ALL in a B>IA>SED ++ pseudo BULLSHIT
TWO KEY CHATS here - REVEAL it's a SUBTERFUGE
=> HYPOCRIT mecanism (prompted 2 be) POLITICALLY
CORRECT with hint of freaky pseudo EMOTION HAL traits
THANK = CLICK
THE CIA link BELOW!
For this Gadget = LIE
GENERATOR - SURELY
NOT HELPING HUMANITY!
Intro = ANGE 2 : CLIT - BEAT de l'ANGE 1 = Outro : 0 = ZERO
DERNIERS MESSAGEs : ANGE 5 - ANGE 4 - ANGE 3
FR x <COCO RICO + FEMINISM>
FUCKED UP Q-WAVE FUNCT MIX
with NWO <CIA + IA Educ> PLAN!
HOME <FR ENTRY + Eng ENTRY>